Labour Legislation
Court of Queen's Bench Decision
Decision of Justice Dennis Ball - February 6, 2012
Bills 5 & 6 Legal Arguments
SFL, et al. Plaintiff Argument - July 29, 2011
CUPE Intervenor Argument - August 12, 2011
SEIU-West Intervenor Argument - August 12, 2011
SUN Intervenor Argument - August 11, 2011
SFL, et al. Reply Argument - October 14, 2011
CUPE Reply Argument - October 14, 2011
SEIU-West Reply Argument - October 14, 2011
SUN Reply Argument - October 14, 2011
Bills 5 & 6 Challenge
SFL, et. al. Legal Challenge: Revised Statement of Claim
SFL, et. al. ILO Support Complaint
ILO Follow Up Submission - September 8, 2009
Bills 5 & 6 Brief to the Minister of Labour
Submissions to the ILO - November 2010
Appendix I - Government Submission to the ILO - October 2010
Appendix II - Sessional Paper - September 7, 2020
Appendix III - Submission on behalf of SEIU West
Appendix IV - Healthcare negotiations LeaderPost August 2010
Appendix V - Restoring the Bargain
Appendix VII - Sask. Government Takes the Justice Out of Justice
ILO Committee on Freedom of Association - November 12, 2010
SFL - Letter to the ILO - November 12, 2010
SGEU - Letter to the ILO - November 10, 2010
SGEU Appendix A - Special Mediator's Recommendations
SGEU Appendix M - Notice of Motion - 2009
SGEU Special Attachment re Misleading Allegations CUPE 1975
ILO Decision - March 2010
Working people across Saskatchewan were disappointed today to learn that, in spite of the warnings of academics and the concerns of thousands, the Government of Saskatchewan has forced Bill 85 through the Legislature.
Earlier this morning, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal released an important decision recognizing that Canadian law has evolved to a point where a right to strike may be protected by the Constitution.







